| Textual Feature | Appearance |
|---|---|
| alterations to base text (additions or deletions) | added or deleted text |
| passage deleted with a strikethrough mark | |
| passage deleted by overwritten added text | Deleted text Added text |
| position of added text (if not added inline) | [right margin] text added in right margin; [above line] text added above the line |
| proofreading mark | ‸ |
| page number, repeated letterhead, etc. | page number or repeated letterhead |
| supplied text | [supplied text] |
| archivist note | archivist note |
[1]
HARDIN & HESS
JEROME S. HESS
HAROLD B. ELGAR
JAMES M. HOGANI am today in receipt of your kind letter of March 18th with enclosure of copy of the Haiti brief1 signed by yourself and Judge Henry.2 We are most grateful for your support and we want to use it to the fullest extent possible. We already have the signatures of about twenty other lawyers all over the country and we feel sure that this brief, when released at the right moment, will have a considerable bearing on the final outcome of the fight in the Senate and possibly a similar influence on the State Department.3
Although the brief is not officially my work, I am in effect directing the work of obtaining signatories and am to decide upon the propitious moment for giving it publicity. I am particularly pleased with your support and very anxious to have your name and your influence used in the most effective manner. I find myself in some doubt at the moment whether your influence will be greater as a signatory to the brief or in some other way, and am inclined to think that your influence will be greater if brought to bear directly on Senator Willis.4 Senator Pomerene5 who is, as you know, the political opponent of Willis, is a member of the Special Committee investigating this Haiti question,6 and while I have no desire to inject into the fight a purely political element, I am nevertheless perfectly willing to use this factor, if it can be of advantageous use to us. If I am not mistaken, Willis counts on the support of
[2]
the colored vote in Ohio, as Pomerene cannot.7 Do you not think that both personally and through your connections, you could bring strong political influence to bear on Willis to induce him to support our stand as set out in this brief?8
We could have obtained the signature of a great many other lawyers. For example, Frank P. Walsh, attorney for the Irish interests and for the A. F. of L.,9 has signed the brief but we are not using his name for the reason that we want the signatories to be a group of careful, conservative lawyers whose adherence can never be questioned on the ground of any special personal interest. Mr. Walsh is regarded by many as a professional agitator.10 You will of course, not misunderstand me in thinking I am implying you are in that class, but for other reasons you will readily appreciate how your signature to the brief could be criticised as a not impartial expression of sympathy with the colored Republic of Haiti.11 It is for this reason that I am led to wonder whether an apparently independent concentration of Ohio influence on Senator Willis, directed by you, will not in the end prove of greater strength to our cause.
In any event, please do not send the brief to Senator Willis or in any way make it public until we let you know.The right moment has not yet come for its release, but as soon as it is at hand we will send you several copies in the final form.
With best regards, Yours very sincerely, Ernest Angell Mr. Charles W. Chestnutt 1106 Williamson Bldg., Cleveland, Ohio.Correspondent: Ernest Angell (1889–1973) was a White lawyer, originally from Cleveland, who worked for a prominent Cleveland law firm after service in World War I and by 1920 was working in corporate law for the firm of Hardin & Hess in New York. He represented the Haiti-Santo Domingo Independence Society (founded in 1921) at the hearings of the 1921–22 Senate investigation on the U.S. occupation of Haiti.