Reviews

Unpublished readers' reports

For forty years (1891-1931), Chesnutt submitted fiction to the Boston publishing firm Houghton Mifflin for possible publication. The readers' reports were, of course, evaluations of the literary merits and commercial prospects of submissions. The original documents, now held at the Houghton library, Harvard University, provide a window into how Chesnutt's fiction was read at the firm. The readers' reports have been all but ignored until very recently. Although Chesnutt interacted with numerous publishers in his career, his ongoing interest in publishing with Houghton Mifflin—despite recurrent rejections—is striking. For an extended analysis of these documents, see Antje Anderson, Stephanie P. Browner, Lauren Millhorn, and Kenneth M. Price, "Houghton Mifflin Readers' Reports and the Shape of Charles W. Chesnutt's Literary Career," New England Quarterly 98, no. 4 (December 2025), 490-532.

Readers' reports

Published contemporary reviews of Chesnutt's works

The following section offers the most complete collection of contemporary reviews of Chesnutt to be found anywhere. We will supplement this collection further as more reviews are located, and we are grateful when users alert us to missing items.

During his lifetime, Chesnutt's works earned publication notices and reviews in a wide variety of newspapers and magazines. Our collection includes reviews published in city newspapers, regional magazines, and national outlets. The collection includes materials from the Black press as well as the White press.

In the late 1990s John M. Freiermuth, then a graduate student in the Department of English, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, collected a large batch of reviews and offered them to project co-editor Stephanie Browner for use on the initial version of the Chesnutt Archive. Since then many more reviews have been located thanks to the increasing availability of historic periodicals through online databases. Samantha Gilmore of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln has led the effort to discover and document more reviews, an effort that has vastly increased our ability to study Chesnutt’s early reception.

You can find reviews for specific Chesnutt works here, or browse all reviews below.

Pagination

312 results

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • June 24, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Literary World

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • April 27, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Interior

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • April 24, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Indianapolis Journal

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • April 10, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Portland Daily Advertiser

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • September 10, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Sunday Times-Union and Citizen

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • July 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Critic

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • April 23, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Nashville American

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • September 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Independent

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • April 1929
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Crisis

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • May 11, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Christian Register

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • April 10, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Cincinnati Times-Star

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • May 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Southern Workman

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • June 1, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Nation

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • 4 May 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • Public Ledger

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • June 10, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Evening Express

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • May 7, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Sanborn, Annie W.
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Daily Pioneer Press

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • June 12, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Daily Inter Ocean

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • April 10, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Daily Inter Ocean

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • November 25, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Bruce, John E.
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Colored American

[Review of The Conjure Woman]

  • Date:
    • July 9, 1899
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • St. Louis Democrat

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • World's Work

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 22, 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Wave

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • November 25, 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Worcester Spy

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • November 28, 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • Zion's Herald

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 12, 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • New York Press

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 13, 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • Public Ledger

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • November 27, 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • Peoria Evening Star

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 4, 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • Lowell Daily Courier

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • Book News

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Southern Workman

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Critic

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • A. E. H.
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • Chautauquan

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • November 18, 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Providence Sunday Journal

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • January 5, 1901
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Globe

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • March 16, 1901
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Saturday Review

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • February 28, 1901
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Nation

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • March 1901
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Phonographic Magazine

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 1, 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Chicago Banker

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 29, 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • Friends' Intelligencer

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • March 7, 1901
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Advance

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 1, 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Congregationalist

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 4, 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Holyoke Daily Transcript

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 22, 1900
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Freeman

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 1900
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Literary Era

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 1, 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Living Age

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars]

  • Date:
    • December 1, 1900
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Churchman

[Review of The House Behind the Cedars Reviews]

  • Date:
    • December 25, 1900
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Leavenworth Times

[Review of The Marrow of Tradition]

  • Date:
    • November 20, 1901
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The St. Paul Globe

[Review of The Marrow of Tradition]

  • Date:
    • November 2, 1901
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • New York Press

[Review of The Marrow of Tradition]

  • Date:
    • December 1901
  • Creator(s):
    • Anonymous
  • Format:
    • periodical
  • Source:
    • The Southern Workman

Bottom Pagination