Textual Feature | Appearance |
---|---|
alterations to base text (additions or deletions) | added or deleted text |
passage deleted with a strikethrough mark | |
passage deleted by overwritten added text | Deleted text Added text |
position of added text (if not added inline) | [right margin] text added in right margin; [above line] text added above the line |
proofreading mark | ‸ |
page number, repeated letterhead, etc. | page number or repeated letterhead |
supplied text | [supplied text] |
archivist note | archivist note |
Your kind favor of October 28th is before me. Replying first to a question that you ask me, I would say that I started to read "The Crisis"1 but got switched off before I finished it. It is said to be quite a good novel, although the best critics say it lacks several of the elements of greatness. It is in the popular vein, which is sufficient to account in large measure for its popularity.
Yes, I have seen something of the storm that has been blowing down your way, and like you I think that everything of the sort will tend in the end toward the result which we seek. I think, however, that the feeling manifested by southern expressions concerning the little incident is very deep-seated.2 Underneath it all lies the fear of what they consider corruption of blood. But whatever they may call it or consider it, I think that it would be vastly preferable to the sort of thing toward which they are tending under the present condition of things.
I quite agree with you that the medium of fiction offers a golden opportunity to create sympathy throughout the country for our cause. It has been the writings of Harris3 and Page4 and others of that ilk which haves furnished my chief incentive to write something upon the other side of this very vital question. I know I am on the weaker side in point of popular sympathy, but I am on the stronger side in point of justice and morality, and if I can but command the skill and the power to compel attention, I think I will win out in the long run, so far as I am personally concerned, and will help the cause, which is vastly more important. I am really inclined to think from the reception so far accorded to "The Marrow of Tradition"5 that I may have "arrived" with this book. You and your machinery6 can do a great deal to further its reading.
For instance, your Mr. Robert W. Taylor7 called on me the other day while in Cleveland. I gave him a copy of the book. He writes me from Boston that he has read it with great interest and spoken of it widely, that a number have promised to buy it and that, in his opinion, it is bound to make a great hit. He has also dropped the suggestion here and there that I can be secured for lectures—for all which I am under obligations both to him and to Tuskegee8.
I see that you received pronounced attentions at Yale College.9
Everything that you accomplish, every upward step that you may take redounds to the credit and advances the interests of millions of people. I for one am most sincerely and unselfishly delighted at all of your successes.
Very cordially yours, Chas. W. Chesnutt.Correspondent: Booker T. Washington (1856–1913), one of the most well-known Black activists of the early 20th century, was born into slavery in Virginia. In 1881, he became the president of what would become the Tuskegee Institute, advocating widely as a speaker and writer for technical education for Blacks, whose entry into American industry and business leadership he believed to be the road to equality. His political power was significant, but because he frequently argued for compromise with White Southerners, including on voting rights, he was also criticized by other Black activists, especially by W. E. B. Du Bois.