Textual Feature | Appearance |
---|---|
alterations to base text (additions or deletions) | added or deleted text |
passage deleted with a strikethrough mark | |
passage deleted by overwritten added text | Deleted text Added text |
position of added text (if not added inline) | [right margin] text added in right margin; [above line] text added above the line |
proofreading mark | ‸ |
page number, repeated letterhead, etc. | page number or repeated letterhead |
supplied text | [supplied text] |
archivist note | archivist note |
Your letter returning the MS. of "Rena Walden"1 and enclosing statement of Gov. Chamberlain's views on the Negro Question was duly received.2 I have tried to answer Gov. Chamberlain's argument on the line you suggested, with what success you can determine from the enclosed type-writer copy, which I made in duplicate, as it was about as easy. It's funny about Chamberlain: he himself led the black vote of S.C. tolerably well, and had hopes, as the recent history of his administration states, of bringing to a successful issue the experiment of providing good government even out of unpromising materials, until his attempt was nipped in the bud by the very methods which he now approves and justifies.
I cannot properly express my thanks to you for your wise and kindly criticism of "Rena Walden".3 Every suggestion is to the point, and I had purposely dodged some of the additional work necessary—because it was hard, and because I wanted to keep the story within a certain length. I suppose, however, it is a species of willful murder to kill a story for lack of words. I have doubts about my ability to make of the story all that you suggest, but I shall do , my best, and then let you see the result. I am glad you think the story a good one in outline; I was afraid it would suffer from the lack of white characters in it. The elaborations you suggest will increase its length several thousand words; indeed, I think it could be rounded out into a "novelette" if not a novel.
I have read of your article in the Congregationalist,4 though I have not had an opportunity to read it. The Christian Church now has a fine opportunity to demonstrate whether it will be really the Church of Christ, and trach what He taught, or whether it shall be merely a weak reflection of society, A good many people are watching with deep interest the course ‸ofwhich the Congregational and Episcopal churches in this matter.
Correspondent: George Washington Cable (1844–1925) was a White reporter, novelist, and critic. He began his career at the New Orleans Times-Picayune, writing nearly one hundred columns in two years. After working on a collection of journalistic essays based mostly on historical accounts, Cable turned to writing short stories, novellas, and novels, typically set in New Orleans. In the 1880s, Cable began lecturing, writing essays, and forming organizations focused on social reform, specifically in the areas of Black rights and prison conditions, and in 1885 he moved to Northampton, Massachusetts. Cable and Chesnutt met for the first time in Cleveland, on December 21, 1888, at the Congregational Club's Forefather's Day celebration, where Cable was the principal speaker. They began corresponding immediately, and in mid-1889 Cable offered to employ Chesnutt as his secretary in Northampton; Chesnutt declined. Cable visited the Chesnutt home in the fall of 1889, and for two years, their correspondence was frequent, typically about Cable's political efforts on race issues, Chesnutt's writings, or recent publications. After 1891, they corresponded only occasionally.