Textual Feature | Appearance |
---|---|
alterations to base text (additions or deletions) | added or deleted text |
passage deleted with a strikethrough mark | |
passage deleted by overwritten added text | Deleted text Added text |
position of added text (if not added inline) | [right margin] text added in right margin; [above line] text added above the line |
proofreading mark | ‸ |
page number, repeated letterhead, etc. | page number or repeated letterhead |
supplied text | [supplied text] |
archivist note | archivist note |
I intended to write you some time ago congratulating you on the successful outcome of your fight against the confirmation of Judge Parker's appointment to the Supreme Court bench. It was a great fight, and you won a notable victory.2 Consider the letter written.
I am writing now in answer to your letter of September 4th, with reference to the candidacy of McCulloch3 for the Senate. Before answering it I called up Harry Davis,4 with whom I have just been talking over the telephone, and he takes the ground suggested in your second paragraph, viz., that because McCulloch had n't been absolutely bad in matters concerning the Negro prior to his vote for Parker, he ought not to be opposed, but I stand where I stood at the time. I telegraphed Senator McCulloch that his vote for Parker would hurt him with the colored votes of Ohio, and my individual vote and such other votes as I can influence in a quiet way shall be cast against him.
Unfortunately there was no one else to vote for in the primaries, which would have been the best place to oppose him, but when the election comes to I shall vote for Mr. Bulkley,5 who is a gentleman and a fine lawyer, who has been a personal friend and a patron of mine for many years. His father6 was an eminent citizen who held a high place in the esteem of Cleveland people, and his son is a chip of the old block.
I sympathize with his views on prohibition, and I have written him that I will support him in the election. I can't imagine him doing anything inimical to the interests of colored people, though of course the party tie is very strong and you can't always tell, but we know what McCulloch did, and though he has explained to Davis the difficulty of his position, he made the wrong decision, and should take the consequence.
I don't see what the colored people owe the Hoover administration, anyway. It has made no effort, so far as I have discovered, to please the colored voters except in the one instance of the Haytian situation, if that was the motive.7 The U. S. diplomats representing Hayti and X Colored man appointed Minister to Liberia since this letter was writtenLiberia are both white men, and if any important presidential offices have been given to colored men they are so few that I do not now recall them.8
Mr. Walter White--2I think the National Association would stultify itself it isif it supported or did not oppose McCulloch's election to the Senate. Whether it would be worth while for it to conduct an active campaign against him, I don't know.9 Perhaps it could be done better through the local organizations, with the suggestions and advice of the National office. I am not very active in politics or indeed in anything else, but those are my sentiments, for whatever they are worth.
Correspondent: Walter Francis White (1893–1955) was a Black civil rights activist and writer. He began working at the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in 1918, at its New York City headquarters, as assistant to James Weldon Johnson, the Association's first Black Executive Secretary. He investigated lynchings and riots, sometimes passing for White, and he became Executive Secretary in 1930. He helped desegregate the armed forces after WWII, and under his leadership the NAACP established its Legal Defense Fund. He nominally remained executive secretary until his death in 1955.