Textual Feature | Appearance |
---|---|
alterations to base text (additions or deletions) | added or deleted text |
passage deleted with a strikethrough mark | |
passage deleted by overwritten added text | Deleted text Added text |
position of added text (if not added inline) | [right margin] text added in right margin; [above line] text added above the line |
proofreading mark | ‸ |
page number, repeated letterhead, etc. | page number or repeated letterhead |
supplied text | [supplied text] |
archivist note | archivist note |
I have just read your letter to Mr. Browne2 regarding the interpretation which you put upon Mr. Carnegie's3 remarks based upon my position bearing upon the franchise, and also what you say regarding my onw position.4 I confess that after reading your letter I have almost reached the conclusion that it is impossible for me to ever get my thoughts regarding the franchise through the brains of any human being; whether the trouble is with my thoughts or with the brains of the other felow I am not prepared just now to state, but there is trouble in either one or the other direction.
In your letter you say: "On one point, however, I do not at all agree with Mr. Carnegie or with Dr. Washington, whom he quotes, in holding it 'the wiser course'5 to practically throw up the ballot, or the demand for it."6
In the first place, Mr. Carnegie has said no such thing. I have never said no such thing. If you can put your finger or eye on a single sentence in all my writing that will bear out this statement, I will agree to send you a first class Alabama possum for your Christmas dinner.7 Suppose you re-read what Mr. Carnegie has said. I feel quite sure that when you wrote Mr. Browne that there was something in the lake breeze which was troubling your brain. I have said, and do so now, that to any people living under a republican form of government the ballot is a consideration of the very highest importance, and there is no disagreement between you and me as to the importance of the ballot; however, perhaps, we do not agree as to the methods of attaining to the permanent and practical
C. W. C. No 2.
use of the ballot. Some of our people maintain that the ballot is a matter of first consideration in our present condition. This I do not agree with. Practically you do not agree with their clnte ntioncontention. Practically, the matter of earning your daily bread and banking your money is a matter of the first consideration. You vote perhaps once in two years. The average brother in the North does not vote even that often, but you earn you’re daily bread once every day in the year, excepting Sundays. The matter of the next consideration to you ais the education of your children, something that you put into pratice every week in the year. The next is the matter of attending church, or "should be" with you, something that you practice every week in the year. If the ballot were a matter of first consideration, one would vote every day in the year instead of spending his time in the laying of an economic foundation every day in the year. Take the people of the Republic of Liberia,8 they might vote every hour ad every day in every year.9 At the end of the period they would not have improved their economic condition nor moral status before the world one iota. There is something deeper in human progress that the mere act of voting, it is the economic foundation which every race has got to have. But I shall not burden you further. We will try to thrash this out when we meet again.
I think after Mr. Browne and Mr. Carnegie have gotten through trying to weave your ideas into the address you will be satisfied with the changes.
Yours truly, BTCorrespondent: Booker T. Washington (1856–1913), one of the most well-known Black activists of the early 20th century, was born into slavery in Virginia. In 1881, he became the president of what would become the Tuskegee Institute, advocating widely as a speaker and writer for technical education for Blacks, whose entry into American industry and business leadership he believed to be the road to equality. His political power was significant, but because he frequently argued for compromise with White Southerners, including on voting rights, he was also criticized by other Black activists, especially by W. E. B. Du Bois.