Textual Feature | Appearance |
---|---|
alterations to base text (additions or deletions) | added or deleted text |
passage deleted with a strikethrough mark | |
passage deleted by overwritten added text | Deleted text Added text |
position of added text (if not added inline) | [right margin] text added in right margin; [above line] text added above the line |
proofreading mark | ‸ |
page number, repeated letterhead, etc. | page number or repeated letterhead |
supplied text | [supplied text] |
archivist note | archivist note |
I beg to acknowledge receipt of your letter of recent date. I note what you say about the franchise in Georgia, and while the riot occurred in Georgia, it was not because the Negroes had exercised the franchise or made any less progress or developed any less strength than elsewhere, but because of a wicked and indefensible effort to disfranchise them.1
I am quite aware that the Negro will not enjoy any large degree of liberty at the South until there has developed in that section a white party which is favorable to his enjoyment of the rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States. The rise of such men as Mr. Fleming indicates that this party, while small, is finding a voice.2 Surely no colored man can afford to demand less for his race than a white man is willing to concede, and as I read Mr. Fleming's pamphlet cursorily during a very busy week, he is willing to give them their rights under the Constitution. The scheme proposed in Georgia for the disfranchisement of the Negro is substantially that enacted in Alabama. This Mr. Fleming condemns. He uses this language: "Let us not in cowardice or want of faith needlessly sacrifice our higher ideals of private and public life."3 Manhood suffrage is an ideal, already attained in this country except where the reactionary Southern States have qualified it. Surely in a country except where every one
CHAS. W. CHESNUTT
1105 WILLIAMSON BUILDING
CLEVELAND, O.
-2- else votes and the suffrage is freely conceded to foreigners in a great many States, including I believe Alabama, as soon as they declare their intention of becoming citizens, it is not only a great lapse from the ideal, but the rankest sort of injustice that any different rule should be applied to so numerous and important a class of the population as ‸itthe Negro constitutes in the South. I think a little more anti-Negro agitation in the South will very likely result in an effort at the North to see, for the welfare of the whole country, that the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments4 shall become not only the theoretical but the real law of the land. The practical difficulties I admit are enormous, but the value of equal citizenship is so great and so vital that it is worth whatever it may cost. Slavery was as deeply entrenched as race prejudice, yet it fell. And the sound of the trumpets you will remember shook down the walls of Jericho.5
If I wanted to answer with the argumentum ad hominem, with reference to the Atlanta riot, I could point out the fact that the riot occurred only a few days after your splendid object lesson of the Negro's progress in business and the other arts of peace.6 The fact of the matter is that this race problem involves all of the issues of life and must be attacked from many sides for a long time before it will approach anything like a peaceful solution. The American people will have to swallow the Negro, in punishment
of
for
their sins. Doubtless the dose is a bitter one, but there is no other way out. It only remains for all of us to make the process as little painful as possible to all concerned.
One of your agents, Mr. Powell, has been operating around here for several weeks.7 I have shown him such small courtesies as I could during one of the busiest months of my life. And he tells me that he has been meeting with some encouragement.
I have read a review somewhere of a book which is described as a very vicious attack on Tuskegee. I trust that this false and reckless publication has not done you any injury.8
I also beg to thank you on behalf of myself and Mrs. Chesnutt, for the handsome little volume, "Putting the Most into Life," which you were good enough to send us. We shall prize it very highly.9
Sincerely yours, Chas. W. Chesnutt.Correspondent: Booker T. Washington (1856–1913), one of the most well-known Black activists of the early 20th century, was born into slavery in Virginia. In 1881, he became the president of what would become the Tuskegee Institute, advocating widely as a speaker and writer for technical education for Blacks, whose entry into American industry and business leadership he believed to be the road to equality. His political power was significant, but because he frequently argued for compromise with White Southerners, including on voting rights, he was also criticized by other Black activists, especially by W. E. B. Du Bois.